All-too-passionate outbursts of love and hate
The only true perplexity Verdi had was in the problematics linked to his noble-blooded characters, who exist remotely from society. Leonora seeks solace through religion, and the confines of a monastery, while both her brother and lover live incognito among soldiers and the populace. We note, too, that there are only three characters involved in the action. Between them and those of the ‘real’ world, soldiers, monks, nuns, merchants, we have a figure offering the peace and comfort of a religious reality, sanctuary and isolation from society, Padre Guardiano. Verdi saw this, and for the premiere in Russia of 1862, he insisted on the insertion of those human artefacts within society, socio-politico in their patriotism as involved in wars. Musically, Verdi was to draw upon religious music of great spaciousness, as well as rousing military choruses. Yet, something was missing; that is, until Verdi asked for scenes in a comic vein so as to counterbalance the lugubrious, the turmoil of existence of the misplaced Leonora, Don Alvaro e Don Carlo whose all-too-passionate outbursts of love and hate will only lead them towards destruction. There is something wonderfully natural, however, about the fortune-teller and activist Preziosilla, the street vendor Trabuco, and Fra Melitone. In truth, these two camps sadly never balance out, and there is a weakness in dramatic structure. The essence of Verdi’s revolutionary aspirations blends with the catholic and the patriotic, while what touches upon the sentimental relates to pathos. Any production of this opera would require an utterly convincing staging, which it receives here, as we shall see.
“Not to alter 1 idea, 1 scene, 1 word of the original version in any way”
Francesco Maria Piave, then poet in residence of Milan’s Teatro alla Scala, was called upon to write the libretto, and this, their tenth collaboration, brought about an intense exchange of letters, wherein the composer’s suggestions proved invaluable. Verdi, a well-versed man of the theatre was an excellent judge of a literary figure’s qualities, Friedrich Schiller, Victor Hugo, Alexandre Dumas fils, and, of course, Shakespeare. Through he commented much on the English bard of bards, he hardly ever spoke or wrote of Schiller, and pleaded with his librettists not to alter one idea, one scene, one word of the original version in any way: this especially so for Don Carlo. Thus, a battle scene from Schiller’s Wallenstein Trilogy was inserted into La forza del destino, making commentary on historical events, mostly relating to the fervor of nationalistic emotion in fighting wars to preserve the homeland’s unity through repelling invaders. The peninsular Italy had always been subject to invasion by sea, as by its northern mountainous regions touching three countries, this referring to 1862, the year La forza del destino premiered.
Though less appreciated overall by many Verdi fans, we must admit that the arias, duets, and choral scenes here are among some of Verdi’s best; perhaps so as they convey inner thoughts in a particular way. As stated, the plot revolves around only three main protagonists, all living in the wake of that fatal pistol shot that ended the life of Leonora’s father, the Marqués de Calatrava. Verdi masterfully creates moments of emotion on three levels: the character’s desperation experienced in solitude, not shared; duets of love and hate when they meet, often not through recognition at first, and almost always by chance as confusion and chaos reigns; and one’s involvement with the populace, whether soldiers, monks, or street merchants as wars take their course. To note, the level of communication between them all is almost non-existent. Here is where the endless libretto is criticized for being confusing, operatically unrealistic, ridiculous. Above all, the ending, both the first version of 1862 in Russia and revised edition for La Scala in 1869, hastily, unsatisfactorily rounds out the eventual destinies of all. But wait. Can there be other possibilities? The tormented existences of Leonora, Don Carlo, and Don Alvaro, as shaped by that horrible twist of fate caused by the pistol accident are realistic. And we must not forget what led to that: Leonora’s unfortunate insistence that they wait one more day to elope so that she may see her father again. Family ties and duty come before love, and this we have in other operas. But what is rare is that all is conditioned by that slip of fate; the time is out of joint,” as Hamlet notes. And Verdi’s score explores this phenomenon, right from the very first notes of the ‘sinfonia.’
Maestro Riccardo Chailly’s admirable leadership in the orchestra pit seemed to take its heart from the symphonic elements in the score, leaning upon leitmotifs recalling the musical structures of Wagner. At La Scala in these recent years, Chailly has championed Italian composers, many of whose works were in close association with that Milanese shrine. Yet, in listening to this season’s opener, one hears much emphasis placed upon the ‘symphonic,’ upon the unison and interplay between the instrumentalists. His recordings of the Bruckner and Mahler cycles with the Dresdner Philharmonie echo here. In itself, Verdi’s ‘Sinfonia’ that sets the spirit of the piece in motion is revealing. Those first six accented half-notes, marked loud (f, and not staccato) are meant to strike us as the pistol’s bullet that kills the Marqués. It is Fate knocking at the door, horribly chilling, piercing, and giving way to the strings rushing forward, a droning that drags us into the action’s dramatic awakening. Listen, too, to the clarinets, bassoons and trombones insisting with that knocking; and all is destined to be played very softly (pp). On diverse recordings of this orchestral prelude with which the opera begins, Chailly took two totally different approaches in hitting those first destiny blows; one is fast, dry, voluminous, the other fuller, prolonged. At La Scala’s opening, he began with the fuller notes but cut them off as if the golden thread of our destinies was broken. A trio of winds brings us the second theme, it being a somber, melancholic refrain, almost a Sicilian funeral march, repeated eight times, but with a dry trill at the seventh; Verdi’s touch of an undercurrent of doom, as, too, the violins continue with that rushing melody of tragedy’s insistence. Immediately after, softer than softer (ppp), we have the third leitmotif; it is Leonora’s plea asking God for help in her desperation. As heard in the opera’s Fourth act, an organ will accompany a Latin prayer as sung by monks, and she, moved, will respond to their voices praising God’s presence in us, feeling the relief, the tranquility that perhaps only religious music can offer. Chailly captured the violas and celli fully in their ominous tremolo. Small details, yes, but each version carries the weight of Verdi’s psychological feeling towards the tragedy he will confront on the stage. This is to say that the music of La forza del destino is so emotionally charged that it is brought to us through different nuances. Through the opera, Chailly aims for clarity, a dry preciseness which allows the music to remain intact, a song that reflected the goings-on upon the stage. The clarinet solo from Act 3 expressed the extended range of that instrument, mellow in the deep register as rarely heard expressing pathos in its fullest; the staging here was beautifully done, adding, and not distracting from the music.
Maestro Riccardo Chailly’s admirable leadership in the orchestra pit seemed to take its heart from the symphonic elements in the score, leaning upon leitmotifs recalling the musical structures of Wagner. At La Scala in these recent years, Chailly has championed Italian composers, many of whose works were in close association with that Milanese shrine. Yet, in listening to this season’s opener, one hears much emphasis placed upon the ‘symphonic,’ upon the unison and interplay between the instrumentalists. His recordings of the Bruckner and Mahler cycles with the Dresdner Philharmonie echo here. In itself, Verdi’s ‘Sinfonia’ that sets the spirit of the piece in motion is revealing. Those first six accented half-notes, marked loud (f, and not staccato) are meant to strike us as the pistol’s bullet that kills the Marqués. It is Fate knocking at the door, horribly chilling, piercing, and giving way to the strings rushing forward, a droning that drags us into the action’s dramatic awakening. Listen, too, to the clarinets, bassoons and trombones insisting with that knocking; and all is destined to be played very softly (pp). On diverse recordings of this orchestral prelude with which the opera begins, Chailly took two totally different approaches in hitting those first destiny blows; one is fast, dry, voluminous, the other fuller, prolonged. At La Scala’s opening, he began with the fuller notes but cut them off as if the golden thread of our destinies was broken. A trio of winds brings us the second theme, it being a somber, melancholic refrain, almost a Sicilian funeral march, repeated eight times, but with a dry trill at the seventh; Verdi’s touch of an undercurrent of doom, as, too, the violins insist with that rushing melody of tragedy’s insistence. Immediately after, softer than softer (ppp), we have the third leitmotif; it is Leonora’s plea asking God for help in her desperation. As heard in the opera’s Fourth act, an organ will accompany a Latin prayer as sung by monks, and she, moved, will respond to their voices praising God’s presence in us, feeling the relief, the tranquility that perhaps only religious music can offer. Chailly captured the violas and celli fully in their ominous tremolo. Small details, yes, but each version carries the weight of Verdi’s psychological feeling towards the tragedy he will confront on the stage. This is to say that the music of La forza del destino is so emotionally charged that it is brought to us through different nuances. Through the opera, Chailly aims for clarity, a dry preciseness which allows the music to remain intact, a song that reflected the goings-on upon the stage. The clarinet solo from Act 3 expressed the extended range of that instrument, mellow in the deep register as rarely heard expressing pathos in its fullest; the staging here was beautifully Done, adding, and not distracting from the music. Fra Melitone and Don Alvaro drifting about both stop some soldiers from bickering under the stress of war and give them hope in their fears and delusions of victory.
The Materialization of Wars
As for representing the stage action, Leo Moscato and his crew did a truly excellent job in every way. The lighting was superb, not wandering, evocative as rarely seen (Alessandro Verazzi), and the costumes (Silvia Aymonino) tasteful, harmonious through all the changes of historical periods, and colorful in an overtly pictorial way. The scenery (Federica Parolini) emotionally enveloped the revolving stage area, clearly as desired by the stage director’s wish to present the drama through the constant shifting of time and place. Some observed that this was cinematographic, yet, with no use of film screens or projections, we were presented with an often-seen mechanical tool as purely theatrical in essence. The four seasons were hinted at as the characters were displaced in their efforts to find or hide from each other, and to reach a haven wherein a peaceful, perhaps miraculous resolution would lift them above worldly strife. As we know, this would be impossible, as Verdi’s music of tragedy tells us. Regarding these choices as solutions to presenting what we by now must understand is a difficult opera, we were made to believe that Chailly was focused on the aspects of ‘religion’, and Moscato those of ‘war’. This seemed to be far from the truth. There was no disunity, and it was as much Chailly to follow the stage action as was Muscato to respect Verdi’s musical language. Then too, yes, some defining all as being ‘too classical’. Well, La forza del destino is classical, not in its styling by necessity, but by its respect for the elements of history in its own time, changing, yes, but always a return to that ‘illo tempore’ which, as history itself, opens the doors to our futures.
Having only listened to the ‘prima’ on the Italian radio and watched the video of this production I feel I must sadly disagree with this review on many points. First of all and trying not to be too negative, I agree in what we may call a symphonic approach of Mo. Chailly but this only enlightens the genius of Verdi who was light years ago from what we call the belcanto tradition. Listening again to the old recording with Tebaldi, del Monaco, Bastianini e.an under Molinari Pradelli you might well understand that Chailly’s reading very much follows the path of… Read more »